英文摘要 |
A prevalent theme of colonial literature is to read texts from a political point view; however, this type of reading can sometimes be problematic and often overlook other major themes within texts. A good example of this conflict in action is Rudyard Kipling‟s Kim. Two major plot lines within the novel that overlap and compete for dominance are Kim‟s involvement in „the great game‟ (Britain‟s imperialist struggles), and Kim and the Tibetan lama‟s spiritual quest to find the holy river. Admittedly, Rudyard Kipling is well-known as both a colonial writer and a staunch supporter of the British Empire. Moreover, Kipling‟s works abound with examples of pro-colonial sentiments, and at first glance seem to support an Orientalist view of Asia in general. However, this paper disputes such a simplistic interpretation of Kipling, and focuses on the novel Kim to highlight how such overgeneralizations detract from other aspects of Kipling‟s metaphysics; in particular, Kim and the lama‟s spiritual quest within the novel. This paper will thus focus on the two conflicting forces at work in Kim: spirituality versus imperialism. It is the opinion of this paper that an Orientalist reading of the novel patronizes the spiritual aspect of the Tibetan Buddhist lama‟s quest and over-emphasizes the importance of the great game in the life of the protagonist Kim. As the ending is open-ended, no conclusion can be reached with certainty about the ultimate choice that Kim will make; however, this paper aims to highlight the seriousness with which the spiritual element of the novel should be taken, and as such strives to expose another side of Kipling‟s world view, one that shows both a greater understanding of Indian culture (particularly Buddhist thought) than he has previously been given credit for, and a deeply spiritual side of Kipling that appears to side more with Buddhist philosophy than Christian theology. |