中立的幫助行為與客觀歸責理論

Neutral Help Behavior and Objective Imputation Theory

中立的幫助行為處罰依據主要經歷了從全面處罰到限制處罰的流變。由於全面處罰的觀點與自由市場意識抵牾頗多而日漸凋敝，鮮有學者繼續支持。目前的多種限制路徑集中在限制處罰內部但並未對該問題的解決提供較為理想的方案。學界的最新理論動向旨在引入客觀歸責理論對該問題進行研究並逐漸成為解決中立幫助行為可罰性以及可罰範圍的有力理論。雖然引入客觀歸責理論處理該問題有利於將處罰標準具體化，也契合了共犯的處罰根據，但是在借鑒該理論之時，應當根據該理論本身的內容進行梳理，即只有行為人不僅“製造了不被允許的危險”，而且“實現了不被允許的危險”之時，才能對其科以幫助犯的罪責。

The punishment basis of the neutral help behavior has changed from full punishment to limited punishment. Because of the free market awareness and increasingly depressed comprehensive punishment contradictions, few scholars continue to support it. At present, there are many limitations in the limitation of punishment and the birth of a variety of restrictions on the path does not provide a better solution to the problem. The latest theoretical trend of the academic circles is to introduce the objective imputation theory to study the problem, and gradually become a powerful theory to solve the problem of the punishment and punishment of neutral help behavior. Although the introduction of objective imputation theory to deal with the problem will be specific, it will meet the standard of punishment according to the punishment of the accomplice, but in reference to the theory, it should be carried out according to the theory of combing the content itself. The behavior of people not only created a danger of 'not allowed', but also realized the danger is to commit crime to help families.