基於區域合作思維的跨界污染糾紛處裡

Transboundary Pollution Disputes Resolution Based on Regional Cooperation Thinking

在中央與地方事權和財權分立的背景下，地方行政機關是轄區地方利益的主體，實施有關行政行為應符合正當程序，與相鄰地方行政機關協商一致；對污染損害的單方面調查或委託鑒定涉嫌當自己案件的法官。法院在民事訴訟中應嚴格審查涉案行政行為和行政調查是否遵循了區域協商合作程序。法院自身應受區域合作規則的約束，需要進一步強化司法中立，在現行司法體制下應逐步完善管轄制度，真正平等對待雙方當事人。

Under the background of separation of central and local authority and financial power, local administrative organ is the subject of territorial interests. It must follow due process when making administrative actions and reach consensus with neighboring organs. To investigate pollution or damages or entrust identification unilaterally is suspected of being the judge in his own case. In civil procedures, courts shall strictly examine whether relevant administrative actions and investigations have followed regional consulting cooperation process. Except for being bound by regional cooperation rules, courts need to further strengthen judicial independence, gradually improve jurisdictional system under current judicial regime and equally treat both parties in litigation.