英文摘要 |
Based on statistics and analysis of 9 Civil Codes overseas, there are four legislative models to establish the rales which define and distribute liability of debts borrowed by a husband or wife only, and the most usual one is within a matrimonial property regime. Each party's liability to the third person is different from the other in the system implementing different matrimonial property regimes. There can be classified into four types of regulations, which are identified on large, medium, small and miniature scope of common debts. The liability of spouses to be severally liable is limited to the following three categories: firstly the debt resulting of the family life together; secondly, the debt caused by the common property; and thirdly, the debt on their concern by both the husband and wife. In the usual circumstances, each spouse should take liability for half share of debt jointly by husband and wife. Supplementary responsibility to the common debt only is put on the personal property in very special cases. A husband or wife is liable for his or her own personal debt by the personal property. The beneficial spouse should compensate if the common property or the other party's personal property is used to pay for the other party's personal debt. Based on the interests of another spouse and a creditor, there are some necessary legislative limits on a spouse to arbitrarily dispose of his or her property or property interests. Those reasonable rules governing liability of matrimonial debts should be introduced into family law of the Civil Code of China which is going to be established in the coming years. Because husband and wife are independent individuals equally, who have their interests jointly but his or her own personal interests. There is necessity for current law to keep an interest balance between spouses and creditor. |