英文摘要 |
Chinese philosophy is often regarded as a subjective philosophy, and Chinese culture a culture with mind at its core. Following the introduction of Buddhism into China, the idea of a boundless mind came to be regarded as the central axis of Confucianism, Daoism and Buddhism. However, this article argues that both pre-Qin Confucianism and Song-Ming Neo-Confucianism emphasized not only the importance of mind but also the significance of things. The philosophy of things in pre-Qin Daoism and Confucianism focused on the “five phases” of things, i.e., metal, wood, water, fire and earth. The “five phases” of things were both sacred and archetypal. The Neo-Confucian philosophy of things arose during the Northern Song as a reaction to the Buddhist concept of dependent origination. Northern Song Neo-Confucians revered the Yijing 易經 and Zhongyong 中庸, regarding things as being created by the Taiji 太極 and therefore ontologically genuine and authentic. Song dynasty philosopher Shao Yong’s 邵雍 approach of “observing things in terms of the things themselves 以物觀物,” is therefore a skill implied by the Neo-Confucian philosophy of things: it uses the rejected way of observing things to allow things to manifest themselves. The subject is quietly contented, while the thing observed reveals its natural state. |