從文獻學的角度考察敖繼公《儀禮集說》與朱熹禮學的關係

An Analysis of the Relationship between Ao Ji-gong and Chu Hsi about their Views on Ritual

對於元代經學的發展，學者往往只概括地提出負面評價。然而，若未能直接研究元人經注、經說，則此種評價恐有失允當。無論是接受，或檢討，甚至反對，我們認為元人的學術發展未能避免朱子學的影響；由「朱子學的影響」探討元代《禮》學，當是可嘗試的途徑。因此，本文以敖繼公《儀禮集說》為對象，經由與張淳《儀禮識誤》、朱熹《儀禮經傳通解》參照，從學術譜系與《儀禮》文獻整理兩方面著手，試圖釐清敖繼公《儀禮集說》與朱子禮學的關係，進而探掘敖氏此書在學術史上的價值。本文又附帶考察了文獻所載敖繼公生平、仕履，訂正了沿襲已久的譌誤，可供學術界參考。

For the scholars in Yuan Dynasty, the opinions of Chu His (朱熹) were really important.; however, they did not repeat Chu Hsi's opinions in all respects. Therefore, we should not ignore the distinct achievements by scholars in Yuan Dynasty. As a masterpiece that compiled and interpreted Yi Li (儀禮, Classic Li), Yi Li Jing Chuan Tong Jie (儀禮經傳通解), edited by Chu Hsi was well known to the scholars in Yuan Dynasty, including Ao Jigong( 敖繼公) , who wrote another important book Yi Li Ji Shuo (儀禮集說, literally collected works of Classic Li). Although Ao Ji-gong accepted some views from Chu Hsi, he also criticized Chu Hsi's opinions in Yi Li Ji Shuo. On the other hand, Chu Hsi had ever referred to the opinions of Zhang Chun(張淳), who compared and corrected the text of Yi Li before Chu Hsi in Southern Song Dynasty. According to Ming Ru Xue An (明儒學案,Case Studies of Ming Confucians),Ao Ji-gong was said that his achievements were similar to Zhang Chun without any demonstration. In order to evaluate Ao Ji-gong's academic achievements, we compare Yi Li Ji Shuo with Yi Li Shi Wu (儀禮識誤), written by Zhang Chun and Yi Li Jing Chuan Tong Jie (儀禮經傳通解). We consider that Ao Ji-gong had a lot of excellent insights different from the opinions of Zhang Chun, Chu Hsi and the other scholars. Yi Li Ji Shuo has a unique value in the academic history.