英文摘要 |
In 1601 during the reign of Wanli Emperor in the Ming Dynasty, missionaries like Matteo Ricci started to come to China, bringing with them some western objects such as a striking clock. They presented these novel items to the Chinese emperor as gifts to win the ruler's heart. Afterwards in the Qing Dynasty, more and more missionaries poured into China, leading to the popularity of western craftsmanship in this great country. Since these western 'toys' were both beautiful and exotic, their artistic forms and enjoyable attribute were highly favoured by each emperor of 'high' Qing Dynasty (lit. The government's power was at the zenith in every way.)Of all western gifts they received, mechanical device seemed to be the most preferable for every emperor. For instance, during the reign of Shunzhi Emperor, he asked missionaries to copy the creation of striking clocks and robots. On the other hand, Kangxi Emperor founded the Imperial Workshops (Zaobanchu) out of his personal deep interests in western science to copy much creation of western craftworks. Therefore, later in the reign of Qianlong Emperor, the production of imperial western crafts came to the peak and its technique was considerably mature. A great number of works were made in this era.The development of western craftsmanship is rapid in high Qing Dynasty. From imitation to adding traditional elements to the production, these western crafts were a unique combination of Chinese and western characteristics. The key to such a glamour creation is these emperors' personal taste for arts and crafts. Moreover, some of them even participate in the creation of craftworks on their own so that the imperial western crafts were full of abundant dynamic creativity. This study is aimed at analyzing and discussing how emperors of high Qing Dynasty dominate the creation of western crafts such as clocks, watches, glasses, toys, and eyewear from the perspective of absorption and creation. Moreover, this study will explore the emperors' artistic creativity of high Qing Dynasty in terms of creator, process of creation, creative production and environment of creation. |