顧頡剛春秋學初探

First Discussion On Ku Chieh Kang's Chun Chiu Thought

顧頡剛的《春秋》學顛覆傳統經學見解，視經學為史學，變史學為史料學，經典最終只有史料的意義。本文即從作者、作品、讀者三個角度，分析這一思想過程：經典作者從聖人到史官，作品意義從微言到記事，讀者則應從史料觀點檢視經典。並分析這一思想淵源，與其存在意識有關，以為中國衰弱肇因儒教壟斷，所以極欲批判儒家經典，重新獲得新文化力量。

Ku Chieh Kang's Chun Chiu thought overturned traditional perspective of Ginology. He treated Ginology as history and transferred history to historical data. Then classics became meaningful historical data. The paper analyzed the process of formation of his thought. Writers of classics should be treated as government official of history but not the saints. Contents of writings should be treated as historical data but not philosophical and meaningful thought. Readers should treat Ginology as history. The paper also analyzed the thoughts were involved consciousness of existence. He thought that monopolization of Confucius ism was the reason of weakness of China. In order to get the new cultural energy so he tried his best to criticize the classics of Confuciusism.