程廷祚與毛奇齡──論《古文尚書》考辨異時對話的軸線轉移

Ting-zuo Cheng and Qi-Ling Mao-The Transformation of Emphasis on the Textual Criticisms of 'Gu Wen Shang Shu'

清代《古文尚書》「辨偽」與「護真」的論述比例之所以差異懸殊，四庫館臣的推波助瀾固然責無旁貸，學界「唯閻是取」的單一認同，更讓毛奇齡《古文尚書冤詞》遭受偏頗對待，影響所及，自然讓多數學者難以客觀持平，檢驗毛氏考辨思維的內在理路。因此還原與重整，清初兩派學人考辨《古文尚書》實質的對話秩序，有其學理必要。是以本文首先確認，「毛閻對舉」在《古文尚書》考辨課題中的互動屬性，接續證成，程廷祚將毛氏《冤詞》的護真立場，據為自身撰述辨偽專著的發言動機，何以代表《古文尚書》考辨的對話軸線，由學者間各行其是的平行關係，導向「程毛對話」，正式系統化問題意識的垂直交集。

To begin with, this article confirms the attribute of ”Mao Yan Dui Ju” in the textual criticism of the ”Gu Wen Shang Shu” Then, it describes the motivation of Ting-zuo Cheng who wrote commentary of ”Gu Wen Shang Shu” based on ”Yuan Ciof” Qi-Ling Mao. We will find the common feature of Ting-zuo Cheng and Qi-Ling Mao through comparison the these textual criticisms on ”Gu Wen Shang Shu”.