原理返還請求權：物上請求權抑或侵權責任方式

Claim for Return of Original Object：Claim on Property Rights or Form of Tort Liability

在現行法上，即在物上請求權規則處規定了返還原物請求權，也在侵權責任法中將其規定為侵權責任。在這種雙軌機制下，司法實踐往往將返還原物請求權作為侵權責任予以適用，但從制度內容與功能上看，物上請求權以其抽象的構成要件，全面地保護絕對、自由的所有權或物權，反之，作為侵權責任的原物返還請求權，並不能完全救濟所有權與占有分離的情況，在法律效果上，也有失平衡。所以，應當取消侵權法上原物返還請求權的規則，僅保留物權法上的物上請求權。Rules of claim for return of original object (rei vindication) have been set in current civil law system both in claims on property rights and in tort liability rules. In such dual-track system. Returning of original object is always treated as one of the forms of tort liability in court practice. However, from the perspective of institutional content and function, claims for property rights system provides a complete protection for owner-ship and other absolute and free property rights. Treated as form of tort liability, on the contrary, it can not provide complete legal relief in a situation that owenrship and possession are separated from each other. In this way can we draw a conclusion that rules of claim of return of original object in tort law should be abol-ished and reserving claims on property rights in civil law system will work well to solve the velevant issues.