英文摘要 |
This study was intended to understand the service needs of homebound education students from the perspectives of students' physical, mental functions and problems, homebound education conditions, present status of guidance work, guidance problems, as well as parental evaluation and expectation of guidance work. The Service Needs Survey, Guidance Status Questionnaire, Guidance Opinion Survey, and Case Visit Guide developed in the study were used. Data were collected by surveying the itinerant teachers of 172 homebound education students, 82 students' parents, and 117 itinerant teachers and conducting home visit to 23 homebound education cases. The collected data were analyzed using mean, frequency, percentage, ranking and the Chi-square test. The data from home visits were treated by modified analysis and constant comparative method.The main conclusions drawn from the study are as follows:1. Cognitive ability and self-help skill were the two weakest areas for homebound education students. The most prevalent health problems for this student population included absence of speech, motor handicaps, body balance, and bladder control.2. The most needed assistances in homebound education conditions were home economics and parents' ability to independently educate their handicapped children.3. In the present status of guidance work, the following were needed to be attended to: (1) Most of the itinerant services were part time jobs; (2) The percentage was high for itinerant teachers who did not have any special education course credits or who were inexperienced in special education; (3) Most of the services provided by itinerant teachers were those indirect ones for parents rather than direct-professional services for students; (4) More than 40% of the parents indicated that they received no service from itinerant teachers. 4. The three problems which received most concern in the present guidance work were: (1) Since most of the homebound education cases were severely or multiply handicapped, it was not easy to make education work; (2) Since most of the cases needed medical rehabilitation, it was no room for itinerant teachers to offer their help; (3) The guidance of homebound education cases did not integrate educational, medical, and social welfare services5. The parents of homebound education students tended to have negative evaluations toward itinerant services. The most expectations of parents for future guidance work were to have their handicapped children obtain self-care skills, appropriate placement and care, educational guidance, medical rehabilitation, as well as welfare services. |