英文摘要 |
Our criminal law theory is difficult to adapt to the urgent need of social development. Under current situation, the following relationships are specially needed to be balanced. First of all, regarding the relationship between strong theory and weak theory, the criminal law study shall focus on the weak theory, while the maintenance of strong theory shall not be the aim of theory study. In the second place, regarding the relationship between true questions and false questions, true question in the criminal law shall have its true premise and objective existence, have its research value and practice meaning, and can be answered through theory study. The criminal law study shall focus on the research of true questions, avoiding by all means taking false questions as true questions. In the third place, regarding the relationship between foresight and prejudice, the criminal interpretation can only take foresight as the starting point, verifying and a-mending the foresight during the process of interpretation, while the interpreter' s prejudice must be excluded from the interpretation. In the fourth place, regarding relationship between value judgment and logic conclusion, any interpreter cannot take for granted his own value judgment as logic conclusion, and any interpreter cannot accept any value judgment based on his personal preference. Finally, regarding the relationship between academic criticism and self-reflection, the criminal law study shall mainly be a critical thinking. As to the critical thinking, it is not only referring to the critique of other scholars' opinions, a self-reflection of the interpreter' s own opinion is also included. |