英文摘要 |
Purpose: This study was originally designed to compare 2 parent-child interaction curricula in young children with autism. Results showed no reliable differences between the 2 curricula groups regarding measures of child development or parent-child interaction. We then decided to further compare the effects of both interventions combined based on whether the mother followed through with the intervention (i.e., became more responsive during intervention). Methods: Thirty-three young children with autism (M=36.61 months) were recruited from 2 child psychiatric clinics in Chung-Gung Memorial Hospital and Tao-Yuan Mental Health Center, Taiwan for 2 years. Twelve children with autism and their caregivers participated in the first year study, and 21 children with autism and their caregivers participated in the second year study. This study used the Maternal Behavior Rating Scale-Revised (Mahoney, 1999) to determine if the caregiver had become more responsive from the pretest to the posttest. One group was found to be the responsiveness-change group (N = 18), and the other group was found to be the responsiveness-no-change group (N = 15). Multivariate analysis of covariance (MANCOVA) was used in this study to examine the differences in the developmental outcomes of these 2 groups on their posttests and six month follow-ups. Communication and Symbolic Be havior Scale-Developmental Profile (CSBS-DP; Wether by & Prizant, 2002), Chinese Child Development Inventory (CCDI; Hsu, 1978), and Child Behavior Rating Scale (CBRS; Mahoney, 1999) were used in this study to measure the developmental outcomes of young children with autism. Results: The results of this study showed that there were significant differences between two groups. That is, children in the responsivenesschange group did better on cognition, communication, and social development in either their CCDI/CSBS-DP posttests or follow-ups. The results also revealed that in some areas, the significant differences between two groups were not visable in posttests but were noticeable in follow-ups. Besides, the significant differences between two groups were also found on their pivotal behavior development from CBRS. The pivotal behavior of children with autism in the responsiveness-change group were significantly lower on their pre-tests but were higher in their posttests and follow-ups when their caregivers' responsiveness changed from pre-tests to posttests. Implications: The results of this study indicated that when the mothers followed through, the effects on the children’s cognition,communication, and social functioning were significant. The effects of responsiveness appear to be related to children feeling encouraged using more pivotal behaviors that are foundational for children’s developmental learning. A change in parental responsiveness is an important factor related to the development outcomes of children with autism in early intervention. |