月旦知識庫
  1. 熱門:
 
首頁 臺灣期刊   法律   公行政治   醫學   財經   社會學   教育   其他 大陸期刊   核心   非核心 DOI文章
篇名
「疏失」和「過失」有何區別?   檔案下載
並列篇名
What is the difference between malpractice and negligence?
作者 王聖惠
中文摘要

醫療疏失屬事實描述。醫療過失屬法律評價。

案例:B有腦中風病史,急救時甲醫師未施予腦部斷層檢查,嗣病況惡化,乙醫師於隔日進行檢查發現腦出血,即施行腦室導水管引流手術,仍於手術2天後死亡。

爭點為甲醫師是否未立即施予斷層檢查致延誤治療時機?

法院認定B無論採何種療法,其存活可能性皆近乎零,故B死亡之結果非因醫師之疏失所導致,無從判斷其死亡與醫師可能之醫療過失具有相當因果關係,判決甲醫師無罪。

英文摘要

Malpractice is a description of facts.
Negligence is determined by court.

The case:
The patient had a stroke in the past. In the emergency department, the physician A did not send the patient for a head computed tomography scan. After the patient getting worse, the physician B found the patient having intracranial hemorrhage next morning and performed ventriculostomy. Unfortunately, the patient passed away two days later.

Issues in the case:
Did the physician A miss the golden window of intracranial hemorrhage treatment since a head computed tomography scan was not performed immediately?
The court considered the survival rate was near zero no matter what treatment the patient received. The cause of the patient’s death was not related to the physician A’s possible malpractice. The court found the physician A not guilty.

起訖頁 143-146
關鍵詞 注意義務醫療糾紛醫療過失醫療鑑定duty of caremedical disputesmedical malpracticemedical identification
刊名 月旦醫事法報告  
期數 201607 (0期)
出版單位 元照出版公司
DOI 10.3966/241553062016070000012  複製DOI
QRCode
該期刊-上一篇 新生兒加護病房照護疏失造成嬰兒永久性腦損傷,最終以2千萬美金和解
該期刊-下一篇 未經病患、家屬同意而私自攝錄護理過程之問題
 

新書閱讀



最新講座


優惠活動




讀者服務專線:+886-2-23756688 傳真:+886-2-23318496
地址:臺北市館前路28 號 7 樓 客服信箱
Copyright © 元照出版 All rights reserved. 版權所有,禁止轉貼節錄