研究採敘事研究法，訪談五位童年遭受熟識者性侵害之成年女性，探討其揭露經驗，內容涵蓋揭露的推力與阻力、對象、目的、方式及結果。資料分析以「整體—內容」描繪個別生命經驗，再以「類別—內容」進行跨個案分析。研究結果發現，揭露是個人、人際與社會層面推力與阻力斡旋的結果，當推力大於阻力、出現足夠信任的對象與合適的時機下，揭露才可能發生。推力因素包括：意識到身體界線受侵犯、欲改善身心狀態、期望加害者受懲罰或改變、預期獲得正向回應、親友支持、相似經驗者分享、女權意識提升，以及#MeToo運動帶來的力量。揭露後的正負向結果，會回饋至揭露的方式、深度、廣度與頻率，進而增強或削弱後續的推力與阻力。在不同生命階段，揭露呈現差異。兒童多向非施虐父母表達，內容侷限且多為單次，目的在尋求協助；青少年則傾向同儕傾訴。成年期的揭露則經深思熟慮，目的包括減輕長期負面影響、釋放情緒、獲得重要他人支持，以及邁向復原。揭露結果顯示，非施虐家庭成員的因應方式可能隨之改變；專業體系的處遇仍存偏見與不友善，制度程序亦有待改善；傳統價值觀與性別刻板印象則構成阻礙揭露與造成二度創傷的核心因素。最後，繪製揭露歷程圖，並提出對實務與未來研究之建議。

This study employed a narrative research method to explore the disclosure experiences of five adult women who were sexually abused by acquaintances during childhood. The interviews focused on the driving and inhibiting forces of disclosure, as well as its targets, purposes, methods, and outcomes. Data were analyzed using a holistic–content approach to capture individual life experiences and a categorical–content approach for cross-case analysis. Findings indicate that disclosure results from the interplay between personal, interpersonal, and sociocultural forces. Disclosure occurred when driving forces outweighed inhibiting ones, supported by a sense of trust and appropriate timing. Driving forces included awareness of bodily boundary violations, the desire to improve physical and psychological well-being, expectations of offender punishment or change, anticipation of supportive responses, encouragement from significant others or peers with similar experiences, the rise of feminist consciousness, and the empowerment of the #MeToo movement. The outcomes of disclosure—both positive and negative—shaped the manner, depth, scope, and frequency of subsequent disclosures, influencing future dynamics of driving and inhibiting forces. Developmental differences were also noted: children often disclosed to non-offending parents in limited, single expressions seeking help; adolescents tended to confide in peers; adults disclosed more deliberately, aiming to alleviate long-term impacts, release emotions, gain support, and move toward recovery. Outcomes further revealed that non-offending family members’ coping responses may shift, while professional systems remain marked by bias and inadequacy. Traditional values and gender stereotypes persist as core barriers and sources of secondary trauma. Based on these findings, a disclosure process model was developed, with implications for practice and future research.