| 英文摘要 |
The Ministry of Education (Taiwan) launched the Program on Bilingual Education for Students in College (the BEST program) to promote the expansion of English as a Medium of Instruction (EMI) courses in universities. Under this program, universities frequently organize training workshops supporting professional development. However, the effectiveness of these workshops remains unclear due to the lack of longitudinal studies on the relationship among training, professional development, and teaching practice. This pilot study adopted a mixed-methods approach, collecting data from 25 instructors who attended an EMI workshop through four surveys over one semester and conducting followup interviews with nine instructors who taught EMI courses immediately after the training to evaluate instructors’ professional development brought by the training and related changes in teaching practices. Participants’ EMI knowledge, self-efficacy, and attitudes toward EMI were collected and analyzed. Findings include: 1. All participants reported significant improvements in knowledge, self-efficacy, and attitudes immediately after the training. However, mid-semester, both self-efficacy and attitudes declined, and by the end of the semester, knowledge showed a significant decline. Notably, for participants actively teaching EMI courses, their knowledge levels remained stable throughout the semester, while self-efficacy declined mid-semester and plateaued thereafter. Their attitudes, however, significantly declined by the end of the semester, falling below the overall average. 2. The reasons for the above changes were identified through interviews, where participants reported benefiting from the interactive teaching strategies suggested by the trainers but struggled to apply collaborative learning strategies in classes with both domestic and international students or with entirely domestic students of varying English proficiency. These challenges led to decreased self-efficacy, reliance on translation strategies, and slower course progress. 3. Most of the interviewees reported project-based assessments and multimodal materials in their final evaluations. However, efforts to meet BEST program KPIs involved negotiating language use with students and adhering to institutional language usage requirements. These pressures contributed to instructors’ doubts about the effectiveness of EMI on learning, resulting in further declines in attitudes. The results offer insights to inform teaching practices and policy implementation. |