英文摘要 |
Purpose: With the innovation of psychiatric care, how to connect to a comprehensive care system after patients are discharged from the hospital has become an important issue in patient care. Therefore, this study was designed to compare the differences in the burden on family caregivers, family functioning, and social support among psychiatric patients in three different models of medical care. Methods: This study adopted a cross-sectional design and targeted three categories of family caregivers of psychiatric patients in outpatient, acute psychiatric wards and day wards in a southern district hospital. A total of 74 patients were recruited from March 2020 to June 2020. The questionnaires were administered by personal interview. The questionnaires included the Basic Information Form, the Family Functioning Scale, the Caregiver Burden Scale, and the Social Support Network Scale. Results: The number of family caregivers for the three types of psychiatric patients was 32 in the outpatient clinic, 23 in the acute ward, and 19 in the day ward. The results showed that there were significant differences among the family functioning of communication, emotion and normative functions of the three different modes of psychiatric care. Significant differences were found in the stigma family caregivers burden, the stress of caregiver, and total score. A significant difference was found in social support in terms of close relationships. Conclusions: Taiwan is a conservative society. As a result of caring for psychiatric patients, the caregivers suffer from stigmatization and rarely interact with the outside world. The physical and mental state of the caregivers have not been taken seriously. After interviewing many family caregivers, it is found that family caregivers’ awareness of the illness and care strategies should be strengthened. Ongoing care and rehabilitation arrangements should be tailored to the individual patient. Timely referrals to community rehabilitation agencies are needed to help patients integrate into the community. |