| 英文摘要 |
This study employs informetric and network-based methods to examine the knowledge structure, developmental trajectory, and research-community configuration of negative emission technologies (NETs). To construct a systematic and comparable dataset, this study retrieved bibliographic records from the Web of Science Core Collection, focusing on articles indexed in the Environmental Sciences category and published up to 2022. The search strategy included records whose titles or author keywords contained“carbon capture,”“carbon utilization,”or“carbon storage.”After excluding review articles, conference papers, and publications from the incomplete 2023 indexing year, the final dataset consisted of 1,957 journal articles. Methodologically, the study adopts a hierarchical and multi-perspective analytical framework that integrates macro-, meso-, and micro-level analyses. The analytical procedures include publication trend analysis, thematic clustering, keyword co-occurrence analysis, citation main path analysis, and co-authorship and affiliation-based network analysis at the levels of authors, institutions, and countries. The findings show that NET research expanded markedly after 2016, indicating the growing influence of international climate governance and net-zero policy agendas on scholarly knowledge production. At the knowledge level, the field has shifted from broader discussions of climate response, public concern, and societal implications toward more technically specific and application-oriented themes, including carbon capture, carbon storage, biomass utilization, bioenergy-related removal, and blue carbon. Carbon capture remains a foundational theme, while the increasing visibility of biomass and ecosystem-based sequestration suggests that NET research is moving beyond an engineering-centered paradigm toward a more diversified socio-technical knowledge structure. At the social-structural level, the analysis identifies several major international research communities and shows that the United States, China, and the United Kingdom occupy prominent positions in NET knowledge production. In particular, the University of Florida and Carnegie Mellon University emerge as influential institutions within the collaboration network. The results further indicate that repeated intra-institutional collaboration among high-impact scholars contributes to knowledge consolidation, although it may also limit broader cross-institutional and interdisciplinary diffusion. Overall, this study demonstrates that NET development is shaped not only by technological specialization, but also by the institutional and collaborative structures through which scientific knowledge is produced, circulated, and stabilized. The findings provide implications for emerging technology analysis, research portfolio planning, international collaboration, and climate-technology policy formulation. |