杭世駿《續禮記集說》成書考──徵引、版本及其佚事

A Study on the Compilation of Hang Shijun’s Xu Liji Jishuo: Citations, Editions, and Anecdotes

本文旨在透過實證性之「徵引計數」與「經說比對」研究杭世駿《續禮記集說》成書之諸面向，從徵引計數明杭氏之禮學接受，從經說比對探杭氏之禮學觀念，益以《續集說》之版本、輯佚、校勘等文獻學問題，乃至佚事之平反、後世之接受，皆逐一論考。杭氏曾充三禮館纂修，與修《欽定禮記義疏》，主筆〈學記〉、〈樂記〉、〈雜記〉、〈喪大記〉、〈祭法〉、〈祭義〉、〈祭統〉諸篇初稿，罷歸後又作《續禮記集說》，其人其書蓋具有兩種身分：一為代表官方立場之三禮館臣，一為表現個人主張之私家撰述。《義疏》稿本所留存的往復案語，及至定本所宣示的官方態度，再到《續集說》所輯存的今古禮說，正為杭氏官私立場轉換之折衷表現。原本「不施論斷」的《續集說》，即在《義疏》稿本之比勘下，一變而有立場可尋，斯為本文創見所在。

This paper aims to conduct a philological study of Hang Shijun’s Xu Liji Jishuo by employing empirical methods, including the analysis of citation counts and comparison of commentaries on the Classics. While citation counts reflect Hang’s reception of Ritual Studies, comparison of Classics commentaries reveals his idea and understanding of ritual. Additionally, this study addresses various bibliographical issues concerning Xu Jishuo, ranging from the examination of its different editions, the reconstruction of lost passages, and the analysis of proofreading processes to the authentication of disputed anecdotes and the interpretations adopted by later generations. Hang participated in the compilation of Qinding Liji Yishu while serving at the Sanli Guan and was the lead author of several sections, including the initial drafts of“Xueji,”“Yueji,”“Zaji,”“Sang Da Ji,”“Jifa,”“Jiyi,”and“Jitong.”Since Hang privately wrote Xu Liji Jishuo after his dismissal from official service, both his position and his work reflect a dual identity: on the one hand, he was an official Sanli Guan scholar representing the state’s position on the ritual; on the other, he acted as a private intellectual articulating personal perspectives. Hang’s negotiation and transformation between his public and private stances are evident and can be seen in the editorial comments preserved in the manuscripts of Qinding Liji Yishu, the state ideology expressed in the finalized official editions, and the ancient and contemporary ritual interpretations collected in Xu Jishuo. Through a comparative analysis of the manuscripts of Qinding Liji Yishu, this paper argues that although Xu Jishuo claims to adopt a neutral position without explicit judgment, the work nonetheless contains a clearly traceable stance shaped by its historical and intellectual context.