| 英文摘要 |
This study examines how tea farmers in Lugu and surrounding mid- to high-elevation tea-growing regions in Taiwan have reorganized labor for tea leaf plucking since the 1970s. Drawing on official archives, tea competition evaluation reports, and oral histories, it shows how adjustments were made in response to terrain constraints, plantation expansion, evolving quality perceptions, and changes in labor supply, thereby shaping local production models and management strategies. The analysis highlights the dynamic relationship between hand-picking practices and tea industry development. As Taiwan’s tea sector shifted from an export-oriented model to one driven by domestic consumption, tea drinking became more widespread, and Dong Ding tea emerged as a premium product. Hand-picking consequently became a key marker of quality. To meet market preferences, farmers widely adopted the Qingxin Oolong cultivar, leading to highly concentrated harvesting periods and intensifying short-term labor shortages. Under these conditions, farmers continued to rely on hand-picking to preserve product quality and reputation. Meanwhile, the expansion of tea plantations and the insufficiency of local labor prompted a shift from traditional mutual-aid arrangements to the hiring of professional teapicking crews. Traditional labor exchange arrangements relied on informal, relationship-based constraints and shared quality norms to ensure consistent plucking standards. In contrast, hired laborers, typically paid by weight, were incentivized to maximize output, often resulting in uneven quality and potential damage to tea leaves. This created a persistent tension between efficiency and quality. The study argues that, beyond processing techniques and competition systems, the organization, timing, and standards of tea plucking are crucial factors influencing production stability and flavor outcomes. In responding to market expectations and changing labor conditions, tea farmers demonstrated considerable adaptive agency. While hand-picking functioned as a guarantee of quality, it also became a structural constraint limiting production flexibility. This study challenges the linear assumption that mechanization necessarily replaces manual labor, and instead emphasizes farmers’strategic decision-making within the interplay of terrain conditions, quality norms, and market expectations. |