| 英文摘要 |
Objectives: This study examined the feasibility of using low-cost, choice-preserving nudge tools to reduce sugar intake from hand-shaken beverages among university students. Methods: A mixed-methods approach targeting university students aged 18–24 years in northern Taiwan was adopted. Focus groups were conducted to identify key cognitive biases influencing the students’sweetness choices. On the basis of these focus groups’findings, two nudge tools were designed: (1) future health risk messaging and (2) sugar level defaulting. A four-arm randomized online experiment was then conducted, and a partial proportional odds model was used to assess the effectiveness of these interventions, followed by focus groups to interpret the experimental findings. Results: The sugar-free defaulting nudge significantly increased the probability of selecting sugar-free beverages by approximately 0.13 and decreased the probabilities of selecting low-sugar and high-sugar beverages by approximately 0.04 and 0.09, respectively. However, neither the medium-sugar defaulting nudge nor the future health risk messaging nudge had a significant effect on the students’sweetness choices. Post experiment focus groups revealed that the students perceived the nudges as preserving their freedom of choice and expressed support for implementing such sugar-reduction interventions. Furthermore, self-efficacy in rejecting hand-shaken beverages and attitudes toward hand-shaken beverages were associated with sweetness choices. Conclusions: Because of their effectiveness and acceptance by university students, nudge tools are recommended to be included in governmental sugar reduction policies to reduce sugar consumption among university students. |