| 英文摘要 |
This study investigates secondary school students’attitudes and motivation toward learning native languages through interviews with key stakeholders, students, parents, and teachers. Using qualitative methodology, it explores how parental and teacher language ideologies influence students’language choices and learning practices. The findings reveal that most students hold positive attitudes toward learning native languages. Students reported that learning these languages create a sense of“identity”and“belonging.”In southern regions, native languages were also to possess relatively high“social status”and to serve as a“common and natural means of communication”with older community members. However, this positive orientation contrasts with the structural realities of the education system, in which English and Mandarin dominate due to their symbolic and material advantages as forms of“linguistic capital.”Consequently, native languages are often viewed as“supplementary,”lacking equal legitimacy as subjects of formal study. The language attitudes of parents and teachers are deeply influenced by past language policies and hierarchical language ideologies, which reproduce linguistic inequality and structural injustice, affecting students’learning motivation. When native languages remain persistently marginalized, schools risk becoming sites of institutional linguistic discrimination. To address this issue, the study recommends a three-pronged approach involving family, school, and institutional intervention. This approach aims to strengthen collaborative language-learning ecosystems, cultivate teachers’commitment to native languages education, promote cultural identity, and establish native languages as valuable domains for cultural revitalization and social justice. This reframing seeks to ensure equitable language status and resource allocation beyond instrumentalist logic and examination-oriented frameworks. |