| 英文摘要 |
Kant’s Metaphysics of Morals has two parts: the Doctrine of Law and the Doctrine of Virtue. How can the philosophical principles of law (traditionally called“natural law”) be described as“metaphysical,”given Kant's strict definition of the concept of metaphysics? And how does this“metaphysics of law”differ from the“metaphysics of virtue,”in other words, moral philosophy? The answer to these questions can be found in the notion of the legal categorical imperative and its application to different categories of legal norms. |
本站僅提供期刊文獻檢索。
