| 英文摘要 |
With the rapid development of artificial intelligence (AI) and big data technologies, intelligent medical systems have been widely adopted in areas such as medical imaging interpretation, disease risk prediction, and clinical decision support, and have gradually come to exert a substantive influence on medical decision-making. While these developments contribute to improved efficiency and accuracy in healthcare, they also place significant pressure on the traditional framework of medical liability, which has been constructed around the physician’s individual professional judgment. At the level of criminal law, the legitimacy of medical interventions relies heavily on the patient’s valid consent, raising a critical question as to whether the conventional model of informed consent can still be adequately fulfilled once algorithmic systems intervene in medical decision-making. Taking informed consent as its analytical core, this article examines the transformation of the physician’s duty of disclosure in the context of intelligent healthcare from the perspective of criminal liability risk. It analyzes how breaches of the duty of disclosure may affect the validity of patient consent, the assessment of unlawfulness, and the attribution of negligence under criminal law. This article argues that, as medical decisions are increasingly formed through a combination of human professional judgment and algorithmic analysis, the duty of disclosure should expand beyond the traditional explanation of treatment content to encompass a form of“substantive disclosure”that includes the decision-making process and the use of patient data. Such a substantive approach to informed consent not only strengthens patient autonomy but also serves as a key institutional mechanism for rationalizing physicians’criminal liability and balancing risk in the era of intelligent healthcare. |