雌雄莫辨：1960年代臺灣田徑運動員百合的性別爭議始末

Gender unidentified: The gender controversy of Taiwanese track and field athlete Lily in the 1960

本研究主要採報章史料為中心，在蒐羅1963-2009年間刊登於《聯合報》、《中央日報》、《徵信新聞報(中國時報前身)》等平面媒體214篇相關報導，經耙梳整理、比對歸納、分析陳述後，進行論述1960年代臺灣田徑場上百合的性別爭議始末。據研究結論可知：一、性別爭議始末主要是圍繞在「DSD人權歧視」與「運動參賽權利」兩個面向。二、本文中探討的對象—百合，從小被當作女孩扶養長大，具有田徑天賦的她，屢破全國紀錄，被張星賢喻為「男性化的女性運動員」極具國際競爭潛力，甚至一度還被視為是紀政的接班人。三、然而當百合具「性發育障礙(disorders of sex development)」之事被揭露後，為重返跑道為國爭光，所以她立刻接受建議進行性別重置手術，努力成為符合社會大眾對女性的意象，但礙於國際體壇性別事件頻傳與臺灣體壇態度的丕變，不僅陸續取消她所創下的紀錄外，甚至還遭受形同剝奪其參賽權利的歧視與刁難，因此最終僅能含淚退出體壇。四、在對DSD與跨性別選手已能採尊重、包容與接納的今日來回顧這段歷史，雖無法去改變、捍衛百合在1960年代所遭遇的處境，但相信閱讀她的運動性別爭議始末，將更助於深切省思其所衍生之人權平等、性別平等保障、參與運動平權等相關議題。

This study examines historical newspaper archives, analyzing 214 related reports published in print media such as United Daily News, Central Daily News, and Credit Newspaper (the predecessor of China Times) between 1963 and 2009. Through organization, comparison, synthesis, and analysis, the study presents a comprehensive narrative on the gender controversy surrounding Lily in Taiwan’s sporting community during the 1960s. The findings reveal 1. The core of the gender controversy centers on two major aspects:“human rights discrimination against individuals with DSD (Disorders of Sex Development)”and“the rights to participate in sports.”2. Lily, the subject of this study, was raised as a girl from birth. With her exceptional athleticism she repeatedly broke national records and was once praised by Chang Hsing-Hsien as a“masculinized female athlete”with strong international potential, even being regarded as a potential successor to Chi Cheng. 3. However, when her condition of DSD was exposed, she immediately underwent gender reassignment surgery in hopes of returning to the track and bringing honor to the nation, striving to meet society’s expectations of femininity. Despite her efforts, shifting attitudes within Taiwan’s sporting community, coupled with ongoing gender controversies in international sports, led to the annulment of her records. Furthermore, she faced severe discrimination and obstacles regarding her eligibility to compete, ultimately forcing her to withdraw from sports in tears. 4. From today’s perspective—where respect, inclusion, and acceptance of DSD and transgender athletes have become more recognized—revisiting this historical event cannot change or rectify the injustices Lily endured in the 1960s. However, reflecting on her story can deepen our understanding of the broader issues of human rights, gender equality, fair participation in sports, and the inclusion of DSD and transgender athletes in competitive sports.