宋人的詞本事考證與宋代詞學生成之關係

The Relationship Between Textual Research on Original Narrative Materials Found in Ci and The Establishment of Ci-poetry Studies as a Discrete Field of Learning

判斷詞學的生成，應有兩方面標準：論述態度的嚴謹性與詞之文體的獨立性。探討詞學在宋代的生成問題，僅將目光鎖定在理論批評上是不足的，還需要將古典學術中的考據學傳統納入考察範圍。宋人對詞本事的考證，即考據學傳統在詞學生成問題中的表現，主要有兩個方面的內容：其一，對具體本事事實的考辨；其二，對詞調本事的彙集整理。通過梳理本事考證的發展，並與理論批評的發展相參照，可以看出宋代文人的詞學意識從朦朧到清晰的過程，以及詞學從一般雜學中分離出來，成為「專門之學」的發展歷程。

There should be two criteria for judging the establishment of Ci-poetry studies as a specialized field of learning: the critic's rigorous attitude and the independence of the textual form of Ci-poetry itself. To discuss the establishment of Ci-poetry studies in the Song Dynasty, it is not enough to only focus on theoretical criticism; rather one must also include the tradition of textual research in classical scholarship into the scope of the investigation. There are two aspects to Song dynasty textual research on the original narrative source materials of Ci-poetry (that is to say, two aspects to the textual evidence-based tradition in Ci-poetry studies): one is the examination of the facts regarding specific histories of Ci narrative materials, while the other is the compilation of original stories out of the lyrics of Ci-poetry. By combing the development of textual research on Ci-poetry source materials and comparing it with the development of theoretical criticism, one can see the process by which understandings regarding Ci-studies moved from being relatively ill-defined to being more clearly drawn. As such, one can chart the path through which Ci-poetry studies separated from general miscellaneous studies to become a “specialized learning” on its own.