王充耘《讀書管見》析論

The Analysis and Discussion of Wang Ch′ung-yün’s Du-Su-Kuan-Jiang

元代實施科舉後，經學著述往往限制在官方欽定之傳注視野中，但仍有少數作品敢於突破典範，王充耘《讀書管見》便是其中之一。王充耘撰有三部《尚書》著作，其中以《讀書管見》最受重視，可視為其代表作。而此文對王充耘《讀書管見》深入探討，利用文本分析及比較法，歸納王充耘批評蔡沈《書集傳》的條例，分析其對《書集傳》批評的方法及態度，指出《讀書管見》確實能突破《書集傳》之說，而表現出批判精神。另外此文亦針對《讀書管見》內容進行分析，包括探討其詮釋方法及辨偽之說等，最後並分析《讀書管見》對後世之影響。現今學者對於元代《尚書》學研究多未予以重視，透過此文的研究，應能夠有助進一步提供理解元代《尚書》學發展的途徑。

Following the implementation of the Imperial Examination system in the Yuan Dynasty, writings on the Classics were limited to the officially sanctioned interpretation. However, there are some scholarly works that dared to challenge the official interpretation. One of these works is Wang Chon Yun’s Du-Su-Kuan-Jiang. Wang Ch′ung-yün wrote three books of Sun-Su, the most important of which, Du-Su-Kuan-Jiang, is regarded as his representative work. In this article we utilize composition analysis to draw together the criteria that Wang Ch′ung-yün employed in Du-Su-Kuan-Jiang to criticize Tsai-Chen’s Su-Chi-Zuang. We analyze Wang Ch′ung-yün’s methodology and standpoint in criticizing Su-Chi-Zuang and point out that Du-Su-Kuan-Jiang in fact surpasses Su-Chi-Zuang. In addition, this article also focuses on analyzing the content of Du-Su-Kuan-Jiang, which includes its method of interpretation and true-false discrimination. Finally, the influence of Du-Su-Kuan-Jiang on later generations is also analyzed. Contemporary scholars neglect the works of Sun-Su in Yuan Dynasty, which we hope this article will rectify by providing a way for scholars to understand the development of Sun-Su in the Yuan Dynasty.