| 英文摘要 |
This Qun Shu Zhi Yao (Important Matters of Governance From all Kinds of Books) was completed in the fifth year of Zhenguan, compiled by Wei Zheng and others. Academic scholarship has categorized this book using the rubric of the leishu (a general term for encyclopedias and handbooks), and scholarly focus has been on the question of the quality of the book’s historical preservation. Yet is such scholarly focus appropriate? This article proposes that the Qun Shu Zhi Yao is not simply a general work in the leishu category, but is in fact also imbued with a distinct personality that is marked by the currents of its time period. In order to prove this point of view, this article will analyze the contents of the Qun Shu Zhi Yao as a means of understanding the method of editing of Wei Zheng and his counterparts employed. Working in concert with the point of view expressed in the preface of the work, this article will attempt to articulate the meaning and analytical focus of the Qun Shu Zhi Yao, constructing the system of thought imbedded in the work. The editorial mode of the Qun Shu Zhi Yao includes such components as ''the nature of the classics'', ''the scope of the materials'', ''the content of the compilation'' and the ''method of writing'', all of which contain the traces of the “meaning” that Wei Zheng and his counterparts sought to convey. As far as the content of the work is concerned, Qun Shu Zhi Yao has at least seven thematic foci: (1) the hardship of the king (2) the difficulty of the minister (3) for the symbiosis of the monarch and minister (4) blunt speaking (5) herders (6) the rule of law (7) soldiers at rest, and each of these themes are intimately related to one another. Therefore, through its presentation of the classics, the Qun Shu Zhi Yao expresses a uniquely rich from of thought, one that is deeply marked by its era, and is quite similar to the approach embodied in the notion “expressing the heart’s intent through fu and shi” “賦詩言志.” In this regard, Qun Shu Zhi Yao writes into being, if however obliquely, a new vision for the Zhenguan era. It expresses the mode of thinking embodied by Wei Zheng and his counterparts, one that sought to “turn the old into the new,” as well as one that emphasized practical values. |