| 英文摘要 |
Vasubandhu's ( Shìqīn 世親, transliterated as p'o-p'an-tou 婆槃豆, 320—380?) Sukhavati-vyuhopadeca (Wăngsēng lùn《往生論》)said “women not born”, in common sense that means women can not be reborn in Amitābha's Pure Land. But another explanation suggesting that women must be transformed into men when rebirth into the Amitābha's Pure land. Such saying leaves the trace of women discrimination, but does not iterate the will of equality of mahāyāna. Thereof, this paper uses Pure Land scriptures and treatises to reiterate its meaning, and from women's status in Pure Land to discuss women's interference to practice. In early Buddhism (yuánshĭ fójiào 原始佛教) there were already sayings about sexual discriminations. Continue to a branch of a certain doctrinal sect (bùpài fójiào 部派佛教), women has been seen as the main hindrance to men's practice. They even become the cause of all sexual desires. This paper investigates such condemnation from three aspects, namely the saying of women's interference to pratice; the credibility of the saying toward the discrimination to women; the discrimination to women from cultural reflexivity. The discussion concludes that such condemnations are resulted from the cultural bias and limitations of machoism. Because Buddhism has been led by man for more than two thousand years, Buddhism has been distorted in some way. Therefore, only to redirect such myth can women walk on the rebirth way in equal status. |