| 英文摘要 |
The overtime application system is a common regulation in the work rules of enterprises in Taiwan, allowing employers to monitor employees’extended work hours and manage personnel costs effectively. However, there is a risk of misuse by employers, which may prevent employees from receiving their due compensation. Since the enactment of the Labor Incident Act, courts hold different opinion on whether the overtime application system can override the presumption in Article 38 of the Act. The two Supreme Court cases discussed in this article provide opposing interpretations of the same regulation in work rules. The judgment affirming the override focuses on the employee's awareness, holding that a clear regulation can override the presumption of work hours. Conversely, the judgment denying this view argues that the application system lacks real implementation in workplace. Based on an analysis of Labor Incident Act rulings, this article argues that the ''completeness'' of the overtime application system is the key factor. Employers should ensure that employees are fully aware of the application system's existence, offer application methods suitable for various job types, and maintain a functioning application process. They should also avoid the unspoken rule of workplace to hinder employees from applying, thus balancing the purpose of establishing the overtime application system with the Act's legislative intent to safeguard both parties' rights and promote harmonious labor relations. |