| 英文摘要 |
This article aims to review the legitimacy basis of various crimes involving child pornography and provide preliminary comments on the relevant provisions of the newly revised Ordinance on the Prevention of Sexual Exploitation of Children and Juveniles. Based on the complexity of sexual elements, this article does not support the indiscriminate prohibition of all pornographic content for children in the name of ''protecting children.'' Instead, we must consider whether, how, and to what extent different types of behavior affect the sexual autonomy and self-esteem of the parties concerned. Identity and the impact of physical and mental development, distinguishing between manufacturing behavior, distribution behavior and consumption behavior to delineate the scope of obligations under criminal law. Accordingly, this revision of the law increases penalties for ''paying a consideration'' to possess and view child pornography. This amendment should be approved on the premise that the perpetrator subjectively recognizes that the payment of the consideration may directly contribute to the crime of sexual exploitation. The newly added act of ''unreasonable reproduction'' is not actually an independent and clear type of crime. It should be included in the act of distributing or possessing, depending on the circumstances of the case. |