| 英文摘要 |
Before the 2024 presidential election, calls for a Kuomintang—Taiwan People’s Party (KMT-TPP) coalition reached unprecedented levels. However, both sides of the alliance maintained firm positions on how to select the presidential and vice-presidential candidates based on polling data. In this study, while adhering to the KMT-TPP“Six-Point Consensus,”we propose a testing rule with a significance level of approximately 0.05. Specifically, the rule tests the null hypothesis that the“Hou-Ko pairing”support rate is at least as high as that for the“Ko-Hou pairing”against the alternative hypothesis that it is lower. Our findings indicate that accounting for the correlation between the poll support rates is essential to avoid erroneous inferences. Additionally, we propose a method for reasonably estimating this correlation and, based on that, derive a testing rule that conforms to sound statistical principles. The proposed approach ensures a fair and objective candidate selection process, with potential applications in broader political decision-making scenarios where survey-based comparisons play a critical role. |