| 英文摘要 |
In recent years, cross-border migration to global cities in emerging economies has become an important phenomenon in global migration patterns. Although existing research has examined its macro-political and economic context, the everyday practices, cultural experiences, and urban identity of migrants in destination spaces remain underexplored. This paper focuses on Taiwanese youth who are long-term residents of Shanghai, revealing how the city attracts them through its symbolic capital, cultural resources, and experiences of modernity. Drawing on a middle-range theoretical approach, the study proposes a“city–media–migrant”analytical framework and introduces the concept of“spatial soft rupture,”arguing that migration is sometimes not a radical, one-way break but rather a gentle, interwoven process of reconstruction involving cultural identity, spatial practices, and symbolic order. The findings indicate that, compared to traditional migration narratives emphasizing economic motivations, Taiwanese youth in Shanghai prioritize comprehensive benefits and tend to choose cities with long-term opportunity structures and potential for global capital conversion. The research further suggests that, as a global city, Shanghai’s pace, cultural atmosphere, and diverse lifestyles enable migrants to gradually reshape their identities through the localization of global lifestyles. This process strengthens their sense of urban belonging and symbolic identification; the combined experiences of modernity and cosmopolitanism serve as significant attractions. Moreover, migrants are not merely passive subjects under structural forces but active agents equipped with risk-avoidance strategies and cultural selection tactics. This paper expands the theoretical perspective on cross-border migration to central cities in developing countries and regions and provides empirical support for understanding the interaction between youth migration and urban identity. From a regional studies standpoint, it not only analyzes the migration experiences of Taiwanese youth but also, in the current context of stagnating cross-strait academic exchanges, responds to real-world divides through empirical research, offering a cross-boundary endeavor that transcends institutional and epistemic barriers. |