AMSTAR 2：運動科學領域系統性回顧方法學品質評估新指引

AMSTAR 2: A new guideline for assessing the methodological quality of systematic reviews in the field of sports science

隨著運動科學領域系統性回顧文獻數量迅速增長，如何有效評估其方法學品質成為學術界之重要議題。AMSTAR 2作為一個更新版的方法學品質評估工具，針對非隨機研究及偏誤風險控制進行多方面改進，在運動科學領域具有其應用潛力。為此，本文旨在介紹AMSTAR 2的起源、評估方法，以及優勢與限制。經回顧整理發現，AMSTAR 2具有標準化與系統化之評估流程、區別關鍵與非關鍵領域項次、具有良好的信度表現，以及簡單與省時等優勢，然在評分選項之完整性、特定研究類型之評估指引、及實施過程方面等較不敏感。綜上，AMSTAR 2為研究者提供適切的品質評估工具，將有助於進一步提升系統性回顧之品質評估，為學術研究奠定更堅實之基礎。

With the rapid growth in the number of systematic review articles in the field of exercise science, effectively assessing their methodological quality has become a critical issue in academia. AMSTAR 2, an updated tool for evaluating methodological quality, introduces various improvements tailored to non-randomized studies and bias risk control, demonstrating its potential applications in exercise science. This article introduces the background, content updates, evaluation methods, advantages, and limitations of AMSTAR 2. Findings reveal that AMSTAR 2 offers a standardized and systematic evaluation process, distinguishes between critical and non-critical domains, exhibits better reliability, and is both simple and time-efficient. However, AMSTAR 2 still requires optimization in areas such as the comprehensiveness of scoring options, guidance for assessing specific types of research, and implementation processes. In summary, AMSTAR 2 provides researchers with an appropriate tool for quality assessment, enhancing systematic review quality and laying a stronger foundation for academic research.