| 英文摘要 |
Compared with the research on the management of social enterprises, those on the motivations of individual social entrepreneurs have been scant. Most researchers instinctively assume social entrepreneurs act on altruistic motivations and engage in the research of management strategies without giving this assumption a second thought. In other words, the relationship between altruism and social entrepreneurship is considered self-evident. This results in a gap that calls for empirical evidence. The present study conducted an empirical investigation on social enterprises in the field of animal protection and concluded that altruistic motivations shall not be viewed as a singular and a priori element. Rather, altruistic motivations could be divided into human-oriented, animal-oriented, and environment-oriented types according to their degree of transcendence. In turn, the type of altruistic motivation affected social entrepreneurs’job choice before they engaged in social entrepreneurship; the business or management model they chose for their social enterprises, including corporate vision, source of profit, stakeholder identification, learning activities, and internal activities; and the challenges their social enterprises encountered and their choice of coping strategies. Insight into the difference in motivation types shall help executives of social enterprises develop business strategies more comprehensively. Moreover, it shall help government agencies customize adequate policies and support measures for social enterprises acting on different types of altruistic motivation. |