| 英文摘要 |
In Taiwan, analyses of public opinion polls predominantly rely on basic frequency distributions and cross-tabulations, which limit their capacity to yield strategic insights applicable to political or electoral decision-making. Traditional methodologies often inadequately identify, in comparison to other issues, which topics most effectively enhance public satisfaction with a specific political stance or bolster support for particular candidates or parties. Furthermore, these methods fall short in evaluating which discourse strategies, when amplified, are most likely to reinforce positive political support.
This study introduces the concept of predictive differences in probability as an analytical tool to assess the potential mobilizing effects of policy discourse and electoral issues on various forms of political support, including party identification, vote choice, and policy approval. By employing this approach, the study seeks to address the analytical shortcomings of conventional polling reports and provide methodological insights for both practitioners and scholars engaged in public opinion research. |