| 英文摘要 |
Advertising is an inescapable and increasingly prevalent aspect of life. Professionals in the legal and medical fields seek to inform prospective clients or patients about the specifics of the individual’s practice and gain a competitive advantage over their peers. Often advertising is the most effective approach. On November 3, 2023, the Constitutional Court of our country declared the provision of Article 84 of the Medical Care Act which states:“Non-medical care institutions shall not make advertisements for medical care.”is unconstitutional. The judgment explores the aspects of freedom of speech regarding the restriction on physicians engaging in medical advertising, and the restriction on the public’s access to medical information, and on the restriction on the public’s access to medical information. Applying intermediate scrutiny to balance a professional’s free speech with the state’s interests in protecting citizen’s safety and welfare. Recognizing the free speech of physicians does not mean that physicians can object to any form of state regulations. Considering the experience of the United States, the focus should be on requiring that advertisements must be truthful and not misleading. When the standards are clear, attorneys and physicians and their professional associations must determine what methods of advertising have the greatest propensity to inform the public and the least propensity to mislead or deceive. As for the normative regulations, they can be sought from the amendments to our Medical Care Act and by referring to the detailed provisions of the Fair Trade Act. |