| 英文摘要 |
In recent years, it has gradually become a trend for Research and development to use artificial intelligence to assist in researching new technologies. Therefore, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office has formulated the“Inventorship Guidance for AI-Assisted Inventions”, which lists five guiding principles so that applicants can understand the relevant provisions of artificial intelligence-assisted invention applications. In addition, the guidelines point out that in applications for artificial intelligence-assisted inventions, natural persons must have made significant contributions to the invention before they can be listed as inventors. It should be noted that if no natural person is listed as the inventor in an application for an artificial intelligence-assisted invention, the USPTO may reject the application. However, since the guidelines do not explicitly require disclosure of which part of a patent specification is the product of artificial intelligence and which part is the contribution of natural persons, this article believes that it will cause many legal disputes in the future. Therefore, this article points out the specific impact on patentees, patent examiners, defendants, and assignees in patent assignment because the guidelines lack relevant details disclosing the use of artificial intelligence. In view of this, this article suggests that when TIPO will revise its patent law and Patent Examination Guidelines in the future, it can require that relevant details of the use of artificial intelligence be disclosed in applications for artificial intelligence-assisted inventions. Furthermore, it is also recommended to amend the Enforcement Rules of the Patent Act, applicants are required to use the“Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Invention Claim”method of writing in applications for artificial intelligence-assisted inventions, so that the examiner can easily and quickly identify the output of artificial intelligence and the contribution of natural persons. |