| 英文摘要 |
It has been debated whether sortal classifiers originated in Chinese and then influenced Tai-Kadai or vice versa. One piece of evidence supporting Tai-Kadai as the origin is the higher number of sortal classifiers in modern southern Chinese, compared to northern Chinese, suggesting that Tai-Kadai classifiers first influenced southern Chinese and then the feature diffused northward. However, Her & Li (2023) provide evidence supporting northern Chinese as the origin, arguing that later interactions between northern Chinese and the Altaic languages led to the“Altaicization”of northern Chinese, resulting in a reduction in classifiers. This paper aims to examine this hypothesis based on the respective classifier data from the Wei-Jin-Northern and Southern Dynasties and the Yuan Dynasty. Classifiers in Chinese matured during the time of the Wei-Jin-Northern and Southern Dynasties. It is therefore necessary to first establish the number of sortal classifiers in northern Chinese during this period as a basis for comparison. We then examine the Yuan Dynasty, which was under Mongol rule. The result of comparing the Wei-Jin-Northern and Southern Dynasties, on the one hand, and the Yuan Dynasty, on the other hand, clearly shows that the number of sortal classifiers in northern Chinese increased rather than decreased in the Yuan. This indicates that a trend of growth in Chinese sortal classifiers, from nonexistence to abundance, occurred over the two and a half millennia before the Yuan Dynasty. The decline must have taken place after the Yuan Dynasty, particularly during the nearly three centuries of Manchu rule in the Qing Dynasty. |