| 英文摘要 |
After the 2019 Belgian federal elections, the formation of a new government was as difficult as in previous terms. If we include the caretaker government for the six months prior to the elections, there was a period of 662 days without a democratically elected majority government. After the formation of the Federal Government in October 2020, two ministers responsible for institutional reforms planned to collect opinions on reforming the system from the seven ruling parties, electronic platform systems, and the Citizens' Committee. They aimed to reach agreement on a future reform of the state that could be voted on in 2024. The Flemish rightwing separatist N-VA party has long been advocating for transferring Belgian federal system into a confederal one. On the other hand, the French-speaking Socialist Party (PS) strongly opposes it and hopes to strengthen social security and solidarity between all Belgians. The Dutch-speaking and French-speaking communities still have divergent ideological preferences. The constitution provides minorities with the right to veto, and Belgium does not have a mechanism for national referendums. Therefore, the question arises: Is the seventh constitutional amendment in Belgium a vision and slogan for reform proposed by political parties to win the next elections and gain more power? Or is it a political reform necessitated by the government's dysfunction and the country's unsustainable finances? Is there a consensus among different political parties and communities regarding the state reform plan? Is there feasibility for its implementation? When reforms in legalism may be difficult, is it possible to carry out them through an extra-legal way? Without the possibility of having a constitutional reform in Belgium due to various factors, what are the characteristics of the new Federal Government after next year’s elections? This article will make a preliminary study on the above questions. |