| 英文摘要 |
For more than a century, the United States has expanded its jurisdiction over foreign items, entities and export behaviors in the field of export control, and supplemented it with strict legal liability, so that it has established a system of rules for the extraterritorial application of export control laws with complex and related content. In order to promote domestic law-making practice and experience, and to whitewash extraterritorial jurisdictional conflicts, the self-balancing mechanism promoted by the judiciary in the United States, has become a tool for excessive expansion of extraterritorial application. Analyzing the evolution of American interpretation of the basis and restrictive principle of extraterritorial legislative jurisdiction is helpful to find that the United States has gradually defines legislative comity through domestic law and emphasizes the interpretation authority of the executive branch. Taking this as a reference, China should enhance its capacity in the extraterritorial application of export control laws by adhering to the appropriate standards for expanding the jurisdiction of extraterritorial legislation, critically drawing on the legislative techniques of the United States, reasonably utilizing the conflict coordination function of the judiciary. |