| 英文摘要 |
From the empirical point of view, the bilateral extradition treaty of the United States has a history of more than 150 years of development, which can be divided into three periods. Each period is inter-connected with one another, but also has its own characteristics. The development has roughly experienced the process from simple to complex, and from crude to exquisite. In this process of development, there are some clauses that have remained unchanged, such as the political offense non-extradition clause, the dual criminality clause, the specialty principle clause and the deferred extradition clause. These clauses witness the process of the identification and formation of the customary law of extradition. Some paradigms of clauses have shown typical modern influence, such as the clause on non-extradition of death penalty, the clause on non-extradition of nationals, the clause on representation, and the clause on retroactivity, etc. There are also some clauses with unique American characteristics, such as probable cause clause, non-limitation clause and so on. There are also some eliminated provisions, such as the non-political offense specialty principle provisions, financial crimes non-extradition provisions and so on. By comparing with China, it is found that some of the paradigms of China’s extradition treaties have absorbed some elements of the modern extradition treaties of the United States, while others have not been fully developed. In the construction of China’s future extradition treaty, the American paradigm can be suitably adopted or abandoned according to China’s national conditions. |