承認與執行國際體育仲裁院上訴裁決的商事保留問題研究

Study on Commercial Reservations to the Recognition and Enforcement of Appeal Awards of the Court of Arbitration for Sport

依據《紐約公約》承認與執行國際體育仲裁院上訴裁決可能面臨商事保留障礙。同時，我國《體育法》修訂後，對體育仲裁與商事仲裁範圍進行嚴格區分，由此，包含經濟上的權利義務內容的上訴裁決可能無法得到承認與執行。對此，可借鑒瑞士、美國審判實踐中的“金錢價值衡量法”與“商業及財產利益解釋法”，從明確上訴裁決是否涉及經濟上的權利義務出發，確定承認與執行上訴裁決的方案：一般情況下，承認與執行職業體育中產生的上訴裁決；有選擇地承認與執行與職業體育或商業活動緊密聯繫的業餘體育上訴裁決；調適“金錢價值衡量法”，排除非因經濟利益爭議而產生的上訴裁決。

The recognition and enforcement of Court of Arbitration for Sport appeal awards under the New York Convention may face the obstacle of commercial reservation. At the same time, after the revision of China’s Sports Law, a strict distinction has been made between the scope of sports arbitration and commercial arbitration, thus, the appeal awards containing economic rights and obligations may not be recognized and enforced. In this regard, we can draw on the monetary value method and the commercial and property interest interpretation in Swiss and American trial practice to determine the options for recognising and enforcing appeal awards from the perspective of clarifying whether or not the appeal award involves economic rights and obligations: generally recognizing and enforcing appeal awards arising in professional sports; selectively recognising and enforcing appeal awards in amateur sports that are closely linked to professional sports or commercial activities; and adjusting the monetary value method to exclude appeal awards that do not arise out of disputes over economic interests.