| 英文摘要 |
Since the Industrial Revolution, coal has been a crucial driving force in the development of contemporary social and economic production systems. However, the extensive use of coal has emerged as one of the main causes of global greenhouse gas emissions. This issue caught the attention of the international community in the early 1950s, leading to a consensus on the need for an energy transition to reduce carbon emissions. Despite this, the rights and interests of coal workers should not be easily sacrificed or neglected in the transition process, if the goal of achieving a just transition is to be realised. In 2021, during a speech by Prime Minister Boris Johnson, the policies of Margaret Thatcher were mentioned as facilitating a just transition in the UK’s coal industry, which subsequently sparked widespread criticism. In this context, in order to scrutinise the complexities surrounding the just transition mentioned above, this study takes the United Kingdom as a case to examine and explore, from the structural perspective of coal industry development and the ideological perspective of British government policy agencies, whether the objectives and goals achieved in the transition of the UK’s coal industry align with the meaning of a just transition. The main findings indicate that, under the global consensus on carbon reduction, the decline of the coal industry is an inevitable trend. However, the retreat of the UK’s coal industry is additionally attributed to numerous policies implemented during Thatcher’s administration (1979 to 1990), emphasising market economics, privatisation, and a vigorous crackdown on union activities—core tenets of Thatcherism. Under the policy logic focusing on marketisation and privatisation, even though achievements were made in creating green jobs and employment, the job security, transition, and training of coal workers were largely neglected. Therefore, when viewed through the lens of the ILO’s just transition concept—‘leaving no one behind’—the transition of the UK’s coal industry amounts, at best, to an unjust transition. |