| 英文摘要 |
The Ping-Cheng-Yuan was the first administrative court in Chinese history. Previous research on the Ping-Cheng-Yuan has primarily focused on its decisions, with little attention paid to critical stages such as the filing and acceptance of lawsuits. By systematically organizing unpublished archival materials housed in the Second Historical Archives of China, it becomes possible to present a comprehensive picture of three key aspects of administrative litigation cases: the litigation efforts of the populace, the responses of government offices, and the case review process undertaken by the Ping-Cheng-Yuan. Contrary to conventional views, the populace was neither“ignorant of administrative litigation”nor excessively“fearful of officials”; on the contrary, their engagement was remarkably active. However, most petitions filed did not fall within the scope of administrative cases and were therefore rejected. The requirement for prior petitioning failed to effectively divert cases, and due to delays by petition-handling agencies, citizens were often compelled to seek relief from the Ping-Cheng-Yuan, thereby burdening it further. In response, adjudicators, motivated by practical considerations, imposed high thresholds for accepting cases in an effort to limit the court's caseload. These factors together resulted in the phenomenon that, over fourteen years, the Ping-Cheng-Yuan issued only one ruling for every ten cases filed. As the first attempt at administrative adjudication in China, the Ping-Cheng-Yuan played an important role in protecting citizens' rights and constraining administrative power, while also providing necessary lessons for the institutional reforms pursued during the period of the Nationalist Government in Nanjing. |