全球重要農業文化遺產（GIAHS）的永續協同效應及其對農村振興的啟示：範疇性回顧與書目計量分析

Sustainability Synergies of Globally Important Agricultural Heritage Systems (GIAHS) and Their Implications for Rural Revitalization: A Scoping Review and Bibliometric Analysis

全球各國正在面臨顯著的農村空洞化，此現象主要是由於農村人口向城市遷移、都市化、農業工業化、商業農業擴展以及人口老化等因素驅動。全球重要農業文化遺產（GIAHS）計劃旨在認可並保護那些透過人類與自然互動形成的獨特傳統農業系統和景觀，並將這些系統視為「活的」遺產。本文系統地評估了相關學術文獻，探討GIAHS是否能成為農村振興的驅動力，並評估該計劃的永續性影響。我們利用SCOPUS數據庫識別了121篇與GIAHS相關的文章，進行了文獻計量分析。我們針對32項有記錄GIAHS影響的研究進行主題分析。總體而言，GIAHS的永續性影響結果不一，只有兩項研究明確將GIAHS與農村振興連結。我們主張應採用更系統化的評估方法和指標，將GIAHS與農村振興策略和過程相結合，並提升灰色文獻與學術研究之間的知識協同效應。總之，儘管GIAHS在成為農村振興驅動力方面具有潛力，但在這一新興主題上的學術文獻仍然存在知識缺口。

Countries worldwide are witnessing the process of massive rural hollowing, which is being caused by increased rural-to-urban outflow, urbanization, agricultural industrialization, expansion of commercial agriculture, and population aging. The Globally Important Agricultural Heritage Systems (GIAHS) programme recognizes and aims to conserve unique traditional agricultural systems and landscapes that have been created through human-nature interactions. GIAHS considers these agricultural systems as‘living’heritage systems. The goal of this article is to systematically assess the academic literature, by employing bibliometric and thematic analysis methods, on whether GIAHS can be a driver of rural revitalization and we assess the sustainability impacts of the programme. Using the SCOPUS database, we identified a total of 121 GIAHS-related articles for the general bibliometric analysis. Next, for the thematic analysis, 32 studies which document impacts of GIAHS were identified. At best, the sustainability impacts of GIAHS were mixed, and we only found two studies which explicitly linked GIAHS to rural revitalization. In this article, we argue for more systematic assessment methods and indicators that link GIAHS to rural revitalization strategies and processes, and a better synergy between knowledge presented in the grey literature and academic research. Conclusively, GIAHS has a strong potential to be a driver of rural revitalization, but knowledge gaps in the academic literature on this emerging theme still persist.