| 英文摘要 |
The global game model of currency crises emphasizes that information events can trigger currency crises. Speculator attacks are often thought to leave unchanged macroeconomic structures but lead to currency crises. To prevent currency crises, governments must thus defend themselves against attacks by speculators. But guarding against currency attacks by speculators is inconsistent with the government’s overall goals. This paper uses a traditional macroeconomic framework to find reasonable goals for the government in the global game model of currency crises without additional consideration of the aggressive behavior of speculators. We use reasonable government goals to derive the fundamental range within which governments should adopt transparent policies, and show that when the costs of transparent policies are small enough, governments can adopt transparent policies to prevent currency crises. Finally, this paper further explores the feasibility of a super-sovereign international currency to prevent currency crises. While a supra-sovereign international currency can prevent currency crises, the economic risks associated with governments losing monetary autonomy may expose governments to higher costs. Even if the fixed exchange rate seriously overvalues the domestic currency, it is only within a small range of fundamentals that the government may use a supra-sovereign international currency to prevent currency crises caused by information events. |