鄭玄撫系統《玉臺新詠》版本述考

Zheng Xuan-Fu Editions of Yu Tai Xin Yong

明嘉靖19年鄭玄撫所刻《玉臺新詠》，是《玉臺新詠》兩大版本系統中鄭玄撫系統諸本的祖本。鄭本《玉臺新詠》為鄭玄撫據一部殘本與一部抄本校刻而成，其所據底本不同於《玉臺新詠》另一版本系統陳玉父諸本，因存有陳本所不具的資訊而具有獨特的文獻價值。鄭本使《玉臺新詠》重現於世人視野中，對《玉臺新詠》的流傳影響甚鉅。明代流傳的《玉臺新詠》基本屬於鄭本系統，而各本在現今古籍著錄中存在相當程度的混亂與錯誤：舊傳嘉靖間徐學謨海曙樓刻本實為泯去鄭本刊刻資訊後的萬曆年間翻刻本，不影響鄭本作為明通行本即鄭本系統的祖本地位；而自稱據宋本校勘的舊傳嘉靖22年楊士開刻本，則又是挖改徐本而成的印本，絕無所謂宋本淵源。

The Yu Tai Xin Yong (玉臺新詠) edition printed by Zheng Xuan-Fu (鄭玄撫) in the Jiajing period (嘉靖) in the 19th year of the Ming Dynasty (明代) is the foundational edition in Zheng Xuan- Fu editions (鄭玄撫系統), one of the two major editions of Yu Tai Xin Yong. Zheng’s edition of the Yu Tai Xin Yong was compiled and edited by Zheng Xuan-Fu based on an incomplete edition and a handwritten copy, differing from the other major editions of Yu Tai Xin Yong, Chen Yu-Fu editions (陳玉父系統), therefore contains information not present in the Chen editions and holds unique textual value. Another significant aspect of Zheng’s edition is that it reintroduced Yu Tai Xin Yong to the public eye, greatly influencing its transmission. The editions circulated during the Ming Dynasty primarily belong to Zheng’s editions. However, there is considerable confusion and error in the current records of ancient books that the supposedly Jiajing period Xu Xue-Mo (徐學謨)’s Hai Shu Lou (海曙樓) edition is actually a Wanli (萬曆) period reprint that omits information about Zheng’s original carving, which does not affect Zheng’s edition’s status as the original and authoritative Ming edition. Additionally, the so-called Jiajing 22nd year Yang Shi-Kai (楊士開)’s edition, claiming to be based on a Song Dynasty edition (宋本), is actually a recarved (挖改) print derived from Xu’s edition, with no genuine connection to the Song source.