色情影片對性觀念及性別尊重影響之研究：男性大學生與性侵害犯罪者之回溯比對

The Influence of Pornography on Sexuality and Gender Respect: Ex Post Facto Research Compared Male College Students with Sexual

色情媒材對於性犯罪的促發效應，經常可見於新聞案件，許多國家亦開始對色情產業進行檢視與規範；「性」並非負面的，但過度扭曲現實的色情媒材廣泛被瀏覽使用，可能對個人的身心發展有負面影響。本研究旨在確認色情媒材對性態度、性別平等尊重、強暴迷思的影響；以及自我效能的預測力。本研究以204位男大生與162位性侵者為對象，探討兩群體在色情影片、自我效能、性經驗上是否影響他們。本研究用描述性統計、卡方檢定、變異數分析、相關分析、迴歸分析及結構方程式等方法進行資料分析。研究結果發現：性侵者並未比男大生更偏好非典型、性倒錯等色情內容，而男大生對非典型色情內容接受範圍更廣；男大生較性侵者更具性理想態度；性侵者較男大生有更顯著更高的性別不平等意識、強暴迷思；性別不平等在性態度與強暴迷思間具有中介效果；自我效能對色情媒材經驗、性需求與釋放性慾方法及是否成為性侵者無預測力。

The provocative effects of pornography on sexual crimes are often seen in news cases, and many countries have begun to examine and regulate the pornography industry. ''Sex'' itself is not negative, but the widespread use of pornographic materials that distort reality may have a negative impact on individuals' physical and mental development. This study aims to confirm the influence of pornography on sexual attitudes, gender equality and respect, and rape myths, as well as the predictive power of self-efficacy. Through a questionnaire survey, this study investigated two groups: 204 male university students and 162 sexual offenders, examining the impact and differences of pornographic videos on them. It also explored the influence of self-efficacy on exposure to pornography, sexual experiences, and becoming a sexual offender. Data analysis was conducted using descriptive statistics, chi-square tests, analysis of variance, correlation analysis, regression analysis, and structural equation modeling. The research findings reveal that sexual offenders do not prefer atypical or deviant pornography content more than male students, but male students have a wider acceptance of atypical pornography content. Male university students have more positive sexual attitude compared to sexual offenders. Sexual offenders have a stronger sense of gender inequality and rape myths compared to male students. Gender inequality acts as a mediator between sexual attitudes and rape myths. Self-efficacy has no predictive power on experiences with pornography, sexual needs and methods of sexual release, and whether one becomes a sexual offender.