| 英文摘要 |
Taiwanese philosophy and Taiwan literature share a common root and have experienced similar fates around the time of World War II. Despite differing in their discussions on the concept of subjectivity, both have profoundly contemplated and pursued this idea. However, Taiwan literature awakened from the post-war nightmare in the 1980s, flourished in the 1990s, and today has developed a consolidated form of subjectivity. In contrast, Taiwanese philosophy has remained in a dream-like state since the post-war period, only truly awakening after 2014-- nearly thirty years later than Taiwan literature. Nevertheless, both Taiwan literature and Taiwanese philosophy continue on parallel paths with a shared structure, though their timelines are not entirely aligned. This paper seeks to explore the common roots and differing trajectories of Taiwan literature and philosophy. It asks: what insights can the earlier process of subjectification in Taiwan literature offer to the subjectification project of Taiwanese philosophy? Using the theoretical framework of“group subjectification”, this paper examines the awakening processes of Taiwanese philosophy and Taiwan literature individually. It characterizes their experiences of“awakening”and“dreaming”as metaphorical states, highlighting the twists and challenges of the subjectification process. Additionally, it identifies four states of dreaming: ignorance, being silenced, evasion, and self-deception, and analyzes the characteristics of Taiwan literature and Taiwanese philosophy as they enter these states. |